the gun control lie rolls on (an obama production)

another sad story for families and friends of students this time at a college in Oregon.

 however i about fell out of the chair watching barry sprint to the cameras as the bodies began to cool and the shell casing stopped spinning to lecture us yet again about gun violence.

now being the son of a highly accomplished bullshiter, i recognize the smell on barry's breath, from across the room, and he was on TV.


We know that states with the most gun laws tend to have the fewest gun deaths.

So the notion that gun laws don't work, or just will make it harder for law-abiding citizens and criminals will still get their guns, is not borne out by the evidence.

now which state does Chicago squat in with it's 396 homicides so far this year?

beastiful Baltimore, with their 250 homicides year to date?  thats 39 more than all of last year.

the District of Columbia?  120 killings so far this year, which is 48% higher than the same time as last year, and 15 more than all of 2014.

two of these municipalities have been sued, had to defend themselves at TAXPAYER expense, in front of the supreme court, and lost.

Maryland consistently ranks near the top  yearly  for gun deaths due to blood in the streets Baltimore.
registering 293 homicides in 2010 as a state, 224 from Baltimore, 171 were attributed to gun violence. that's 76% kids, from 1 shithole town.

And I would particularly ask America's gun owners who are using those guns -- properly, safely, to hunt, for sport, for protecting their families — to think about whether your views are being properly represented by the organization that suggests its speaking for you.

i will tell you without hesitation mr. pRESIDENT that without the NRA, District of Columbia v Heller, and McDonald v Chicago NEVER get heard, and the people who live there would be considered criminals for exercising their 2nd amendment rights.

stop pretending to be worried about my safety barry, be honest just fucking once, and say you hate an armed citizenry.

exercise a right smartly handed down to you by the founders, and support the only group opposing the tyrannical turds on the left.

obama's wendesday gun grab

the gipper and i both.


my predictions on what you may to hear tomorrow;

magazine bans=if you currently have mags capable of holding 10 rounds or more, you will have to give them up.  the argument will be the 2nd amendment covers your right to arms, not the box magazines that feed them.

ammunition rationing and identity check=you will only be allowed X amount of ammo and you will have to show ID to purchase it.  these transactions will be tracked, currently gun purchases are not.

very strict enforcement of gun free/drug free school zones=clinton tried this way back in the 90's and it got scuttled.  look for it to resurface and be applied to all who live within 1000 feet of a church or school, and have government insured home loans (vha, fha, va).

registry=what type of and how many firearms do you own?  this will include magazines and ammunition and will be sliding fee based.  the more dangerous looking your gun is,  the greater the cost of your permit.  this will be on a national level.

mandatory security measures=got to have a safe.  "excessive" amounts of ammo=gotta have a HAZMAT placard on the casa.  you will be required to have an alarm system.  look for your home owner insurance to be null and void if you fail to do as you are told.

right of federal government inspection=you failed to register guns, that you may or may not still own. we have the right to inspect, based on the public safety threat they pose to the community.

mandatory insurance=thanks for letting us know what you have, based on this information, we feel you are a significant threat to society, soooo you must maintain X amount of insurance, to mitigate any harm that arises from your peaceful, lawful activity.

hazard tax=libs have been floating this for years.  tax the shit out of ammo to the point you can not afford it any longer.

closing of range facilities due to the environmental hazards they create. 

these are just the things i can think of, and based on that and what we see tomorrow, i can not imagine why people distrust the current administration.  everything i mentioned has previously been tried by libtards, and will almost certainly rear it's ugly head in some form again, soon.

i also think obama will ask citizens to report "suspicious" activities to the feds.  "hello, is this big brother?  yes,  i called because my neighbor, he hunts and shoots.  yes, he taught his kids as well, they told us about it.  the kids appeared to enjoy it, which i find troubling.  i've been on the interactive map, and he failed to register, i am very frightened."

 


 far fetched?  every dictator in modern times has used informants, some family and school based, to trample dissent.  it CAN happen here too.  there will be a call for kids to tell on mommy and daddy. the only reason to surround yourself with kids at the presser tomorrow,  is to get the message out about how concerned you are, and how you need children's help to combat gun violence, which the kids will be told most often occurs at home.

join the NRA,  they are one of your last and best hopes for maintaining YOUR 2nd amendment rights.
 

in defense of the 2nd amendment

this has taken sometime to write, so while it may seem i'm behind the curve, it is an ongoing and still highly relevant story.

the news media is awash with the story of sandy hook elementary school tragedy, and with good cause.  anyone who can not see the horror in the homicides of 20 young children and 7 adults, at the hands of a depraved individual, needs to have their head examined, and probably be removed from society.

notice how i did not refer to that connecticut piece of shit as either a young man, troubled young man or alleged shooting suspect?  did you also catch how i did not refer to the weapon he used to commit these killings?  in doing those two things i squarely fixed the blame to the offender for those outrageous acts he perpetrated on innocent children, school staff, their families and the community as a whole.  i also did not attack the manufacturer of the device the guilty used  to carry out his attack.

i can clearly see who was responsible for the massacre in newtown, but many among us can not.   the brass had not even finished hitting the floor, and the usual democrats were sprinting to the nearest camera and microphone, to renew the call for a reinstated and stricter assault weapons ban. to wit, dianne feinstein's plan for gun restriction and registration which she would have banned include;

120 specifically-named firearms, certain other semiautomatic rifles, handguns, shotguns that can accept a detachable magazine and have one military characteristic, semiautomatic rifles and handguns with a fixed magazine that can accept more than 10 rounds.

feinstein's proposed legislation does include a "grandfather clause", but there is a catch, in that weapons must be legally possessed on the date of enactment, (GOOD IDEA), a background check be conducted on the current lawful owner and any transferee, that the type and serial number of the weapon be recorded, that the current lawful owner have positive identification, including photographs and fingerprints, and that a certification from local law enforcement of identity and that possession would not violate state or local law. feinstein also wants any of these legally owned and currently privately held firearms treated, as NFA regulated firearms.

here are some questions to ask yourself, and anyone you meet, who wants to regulate/steal your freedom.

*why is it that gun owners have to have current identification, while persons who would vote do not?

*what purpose is served by photographing and fingerprinting lawful gun owners?  do liberals really believe that if ATF had Nancy Lanza's pic and prints on file, that none of this would have occurred?

how about this OP-ED piece written by current sitting federal judge larry burns, for the l.a. times, in which he states, in part, "There is just no reason civilians need to own assault weapons and high-capacity magazines", and called for a renewal of the assault weapons ban, "with some teeth this time", by the,  "Ban (upon) the manufacture, importation, sale, transfer and possession of both assault weapons and high-capacity magazines.... I don't care whether it's called gun control or a gun ban. I'm for it."

now i did not go to law school like old larry here, but i'm going to guess that what he is advocating   is a violation of our civil rights, namely the IV amendment.  i also know that larry is seated for life to rule from that bench, but if his vision was to come to fruition, i hope he has the guts to go and confiscate these "assault weapons" and their evil magazines, in stead of just sending common cops to what will probably be a blood bath.

time for a bit of honesty here.  is there anyone out there who truly thinks that if that asshole had broke out the window at sandy hook, and walked in with a hatchet and machete, that he could not have completed this atrocity?   the answer is yes, there really are folks who think it might not have been so bad.  but i'm here to tell you those folks are wrong.

i say this because i know there was NO ONE in position to stop the killer.  i say this while having a great deal of respect for a true hero, DAWN HOCHSPRUNG, who attacked the killer upon his entry to her school, with her bare hands.  now think about the courage and resolve that act took, knowing she probably had ZERO chance of success, but trying anyway.  now think about what she could have done if she had been armed and reasonably trained.

oh, the scorn and derision heaped upon wayne lapierre of the NRA, for just suggesting that idea.  but he is right.  when seconds count, the cops are minutes away.  no disrespect intended toward those on the thin blue line, but it is the truth.

it is time to arm our teachers, not all of them, but certainly those who are willing.  as  LTC. Dave Grossman  points out repeatedly, we have spent lots of money to insure no children die in school fires in the UNITED (divided) STATES, but refuse to harden our schools to these type of attacks.  this is all that lapierre was telling us to do.  have you ever wondered why nuts rarely attack police stations or gun stores, but enjoy shooting  up schools, churches, movie theaters, malls, office complexes and the like?  it's because politicians have not (yet) made it illegal for those who frequent cop and gun shops to carry guns.  that and the fact that those with guns in those places are highly likely to shoot back.

bob costas opined on this while talking out his ass about the aurora theater shooting.  in addition to falsely claiming that that nut job took military grade artillery into the theater, he stated that he felt that the presence of an armed citizen in the theater, would have only added to the carnage.  here i strongly disagree with the little  sports caster from commack, new york.  as any good combat veteran could tell mr. costas, had he bothered to ask, no OPLAN survives initial contact.  that means that when the "joker" entered the century theater and started shooting unarmed people, if a CCW holder had been present, and could have put rounds on target, things would changed for that piece of shit.  now instead of  being the hunter, the "joker" would have become the hunted.  he would have had to deal with whoever was trying to kill him or have had to unass the area of operations. and that means others may have lived.

so what does all this equal.  well the obvious, that the liberals want to control every part of your life, including your potential death.  they proclaim, outsource your personal safety to the government, and the government will, well they will probably fuck it up.  look no further than operation FAST & FURIOUS, and the 2 known U.S. deaths associated with that debacle.  how about the botched F.B.I. "investigation" into ft. hood shooter nidal hussein, before he started killing people?  the Christmas day airliner bombing attempt?  that guy was stopped by a dutch film maker, and not the U.S. counter terrorism center, who had received a tip from british intelligence prior to that attack.

here is an often repeated refrain familiar to regular readers of this blog.   prepare yourself and do not rely on anyone else for your safety.  madison and mason knew this when they included the 2nd amendment to the Constitution in 1789.  we should endeavor to remember that, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, in order to form a well regulated militia, which is necessary for the security of a free state, shall not be infringed.  while i have changed the syntax of the statement, i did not change its meaning, just re-worded it for modern speech patterns.  nowhere in either of those statements can you find any prohibition on the type of arms that citizens may possess.  do your duty as prescribed by the founding fathers or at least support the citizens and organizations who defend that right for you.